Saturday, May 3, 2008

Do The World s Poor Children Really Need A $100 Laptop?

The chairman and founder of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab has recently launched & 39; $ 100 laptop in the world media. Is it necessary?
MIT established a non-profit association called One Laptop Per Child, design, manufacture and distribute laptop computers to be provided to governments at various costs and issued to children by participating schools on the basis d & 39; one laptop per child. These machines will be robust, based on Linux and & 39; energy-efficiently as part of the engine alone can generate sufficient power for operation & 39;.
The Internet connectivity issue is addressed in several ways, including the & 39; use of Wi-Fi, WiMax, 3G and satellites and fibre, coaxial cable and plain old telephone. Competition, deregulation and the fact that the developing world is now the only new telecommunications market, all perhaps contribute to the availability of greater scope, greater bandwidth and more importantly in these countries, the decline in connection costs.
The proposed solution is a $ 100 laptop: a durable, versatile machine at a price that the developing world can afford. The fact that this objective has been achieved is indeed a remarkable achievement, the very notion of what & 39; until very recently was avoided by leaders of industry & 39; impossible.
The strongest argument in favour of this idea cheap laptop rests on the laurel that the greatest assets d & 39; people are his children, and so the highest priority on social east & 39; education these children. Throughout the illness, natural disasters, war and poverty, education & 39; characteristics as the first solution to the problem.
Most educators argue that & 39; effectiveness of learning & 39; d & 39; follows a basic level of personal curiosity about a subject, and in a sense, the ability & 39; self-education. The essential point here & 39; n is not so much that every child knows to this day, c & 39; is rather the prospect that & 39; they can bring to bear on a problem. It is well known case studies of this network & 39; learning, increased by technology, computers and Internet connectivity, bears fruit in heavy academia.
The saving of $ 100 a laptop based on the following issues: Nearly half the purchase price & 39; d & 39; a new laptop is taken up by the cost of sales, marketing, distribution and of course always shamelessly profit margin. By sidestepping the & 39; entire retail and distribution directly to governments in the & 39; absence of profit-driven targets a huge part of the price per model is evaporated.
Physically the most expensive aspect is the & 39; screen. L & 39; d & 39; use a technology called E-Ink MIT, which offers the potential d & 39; be as low as 10 cents per square inch and daylight readable offers clear resolution is promising. The processor, memory and power can be stripped down, as the functionality of the machine n & 39; not need & 39; be advanced beyond surfing, e-mail and word processing like all open-source software reduces that takes few resources.
It is now no doubt that the $ 100 laptop-t-il. Whether c & 39; is a good idea? Everything about " said yes ", though sociologists have yet to collect their argument on it seems.



Bookmark it: del.icio.usdigg.comreddit.comnetvouz.comgoogle.comyahoo.comtechnorati.comfurl.netbloglines.comsocialdust.comma.gnolia.comnewsvine.comslashdot.orgsimpy.com

No comments: